Skip to main content

OSRR-456-Techniques to Remove Dissolved Dispersant from Ohmsett Basin Water

Office/Division Program
OSRR
Project Number
456
Category
Research Initiation Date (Award Date)
Research Performing Activity
S.L. Ross Environmental Research, Ltd.
Research Principal Investigator
Ian Buist
Research Contracting Agency
Description

This project researched techniques to remove dissolved dispersant from Ohmsett water after the tank has been used for a series of chemical dispersant effectiveness experiments. The primary objective of the proposed study was to develop and test a simple, inexpensive system for expediently removing dissolved dispersant from Ohmsett tank water. The second objective of the study was to select and refine an analytical technique for determining the concentration of dissolved dispersant in the tank salt water.

Powdered activated carbon (PAC) was determined to be the best answer for the removal of dissolved dispersant from the tank water after chemical dispersant tests at Ohmsett. The selected analytical technique was to measure the interfacial tension of the water against a highly refined mineral oil (USP or Technical grade) with a DuNouy ring tensiometer following procedures laid out in ASTM D971.

A prototype treatment system was built and tested following a series of cold-water dispersant experiments at Ohmsett in March 2003. The system consisted of three modified ISO shipping containers placed end to end in the tank, spanning its width. The containers held well-mixed slurry of activated carbon through which the tank water flowed from South to North under the influence of the filtration pumps.

The top and both sides of the three containers were cut away. The sides were replaced with an expanded metal mesh that supported a very fine filter cloth clamped around the edges of the opening. PVC air piping to bubble the slurry and maintain the PAC in suspension was laid along the bottom of the container. An additional air pipe was placed directly at the bottom of the downstream, or exit, side to provide agitation to that filter cloth to ensure is did not become clogged by a cake of PAC. A square was cut in the bottom of the container and covered with mesh and cloth to permit the container to drain completely when removed from the tank. The intervening spaces between the ends of the containers were sealed with rubber wipers. Each container initially had 200 pounds of PAC added to it, and then the air bubbler system was activated. The head created by the filter pump moving water from the North end of the tank to the South end forced water through the filter cloth on the upstream (South) side of the containers and out the downstream (North) side at an average velocity of 0.5 ft/min. In the 15 minutes that the water spent inside the 8-foot wide containers it was thoroughly mixed with the PAC slurry. A second 200 pounds of PAC was added to each container on the second day of operation, for a total of 1200 lbs. The system was operated unattended for 72 hours.

Grab samples of the tank water taken before and after installation of the prototype system showed that it reduced the concentration of Corexit 9527 dispersant in the water (about 20 gallons had been sprayed during the testing program) from a range of 5.5 to 9 ppm before to below the detection limit (1 ppm) after. Combining the three to five days required to operate the leaf filter to reduce dispersed oil concentrations to below 10 ppm) and a two- to three-day period of treatment with PAC, it should be possible to return the tank to a quality that meets the standard for equipment testing in one week following a dispersant test series.

Latest progress update

Completed